<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sneakykitty &#187; Facepalm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/category/writings/facepalm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sneakykitty.com</link>
	<description>Stuff by Lindsay Carruth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Twilight is socially acceptable girl-porn</title>
		<link>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/11/26/twilight-is-socially-acceptable-girl-porn/</link>
		<comments>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/11/26/twilight-is-socially-acceptable-girl-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facepalm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodybits.sneakykitty.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to start by explaining the title of this post in sections.</p>
<p>Socially acceptable &#8211; sure, there&#8217;s no shortage of people willing to spend oodles of time mocking Twilight and its fanbase&#8230; but it&#8217;s still something that&#8217;s shown in theaters, still something you can easily buy at almost any store with a book section &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/11/26/twilight-is-socially-acceptable-girl-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The vacation that wasn&#039;t: four situations that merit discussion here</title>
		<link>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/09/12/the-vacation-that-wasnt-four-situations-that-merit-discussion-here/</link>
		<comments>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/09/12/the-vacation-that-wasnt-four-situations-that-merit-discussion-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facepalm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storytime!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodybits.sneakykitty.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just come back from a bit of traveling, and several things happened that i want to talk about here. This is going to be a very long post.</p>
<p>First things first: i&#8217;m very protective of certain aspects of my private life: there are some stories that are not mine to tell, and for those situations, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/09/12/the-vacation-that-wasnt-four-situations-that-merit-discussion-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New study indicates journalists don&#039;t know how to interpret scientific studies</title>
		<link>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/07/31/new-study-indicates-journalists-dont-know-how-to-interpret-scientific-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/07/31/new-study-indicates-journalists-dont-know-how-to-interpret-scientific-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facepalm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodybits.sneakykitty.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be fair: the same conclusion is tested and proven in virtually every column or article that features the word &#8220;study&#8221;. Any article that mentions both evolution and body image means that Ben and i are both going to have a field day.</p>
<p>This article is like a grown up version of &#8220;Highlights For Kids&#8221;, except [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sneakykitty.com/index.php/2009/07/31/new-study-indicates-journalists-dont-know-how-to-interpret-scientific-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

